Supreme Court of Canada ruling in fraud case provides comfort to lenders

In a contest between two innocent creditors over the proceeds of shares credited to an investment account which were traceable to fraudulently obtained funds, the Supreme Court of Canada held in favour of the Bank of Montreal (“BMO”), a secured creditor. The decision should provide lenders with a degree of comfort where it is later uncovered that the assets subject to their security interest were purchased with funds obtained through fraud.

In i Trade Finance Inc. v. Bank of Montreal, the Court had to determine whether the pledge of fraudulently obtained shares granted to BMO made it bona fide purchaser for value without notice of fraud. Otherwise, i Trade Finance Inc. (“i Trade”), which had lent the defrauding party (the “Fraudster”) the funds used to purchase the shares in question, could rely on an order obtained through a civil proceeding entitling i Trade to obtain any assets traceable to the funds of which it is was defrauded (excluding assets in the hands of a bona fide purchaser for value without notice).

The Court’s reasoning that the Fraudster had rights in the shares sufficient to support the granting of a security interest to BMO hinged on the principle of contract law that fraud does not render a contract void automatically, but rather a contract tainted by fraud is voidable at the election of the party defrauded. The fraud had not yet been uncovered at the time of the pledge, so BMO was able to fit itself into the exception to the tracing order as a bona fide purchaser for value without notice as a pledgee.

The reasoning in this case should be helpful where a secured creditor’s interest is challenged on the basis that the collateral was obtained through fraud. However, lenders should remain diligent. The reasoning may not extend where the fraud is uncovered before the lender’s security interest attaches to the fraudulently obtained collateral as the Fraudster must have rights in the collateral for a security interest to attach.
 

Canadian Federal Government Reintroduces March 22, 2011 Budget Measures

“Today I am presenting the essential commitments our Government made on March 22.”

The Honourable Jim Flaherty
Minister of Finance

On June 6, 2011, the Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, tabled the first federal budget of the Conservative majority government. The Budget includes all of the measures that were introduced in the March 22, 2011 budget. The March 22, 2011 budget was not adopted by Parliament before its dissolution on March 26, 2011.

The Budget provides an update of the government’s projected budgetary deficits. The government now projects that the deficit in 2010-11 will be $36.2 billion (as compared to $40.5 projected in the March 22, 2011 budget) and that the deficit in 2011-12 will be $32.3 billion (as compared to $29.6 billion projected in the March 22, 2011 budget). The government now projects that by reducing expenses, a surplus will be achieved in 2014-15, one year earlier than was projected in the March 22, 2011 budget.

The Budget includes a provision in 2011-12 for $2.2 billion in support of a satisfactory agreement between Canada and Quebec on sales tax harmonization. It also provides for the gradual elimination of the per vote allowance paid to political parties by 2015-16.

The Budget reintroduces all of the tax measures announced in the March 22, 2011 budget, and does not introduce any additional tax measures. For a detailed discussion of the March 22, 2011 budget measures, see our Budget Briefing 2011. The Budget provides that all of the measures in the March 22, 2011 budget that were to be effective on the “Budget Date” are to be effective on March 22, 2011.

To access the Budget and related documents, click here.

If you have any questions or require additional analysis of the Budget’s tax measures, please contact any member of our Tax Department.